Venture
Financing -
Reality Versus
Rumors with Dick
Brown
A few weeks ago,
I read this
request in one
of LinkedIn’s
discussion
groups:
Does anyone know where I can find angel investors for our project that requires $500,000 funding?
It was at the end of a good week and I was in a winsome mode. I responded:
Go to NYC. Book a room in the Plaza. At cocktail hour go to the Oak Bar and order a beer. 90% of all the people in that bar can afford to fund your project. Bring your lawyer to cover the details.
After writing
this, it
suddenly struck
me that it was
literally true
and if you were
at the Plaza and
could interrupt
the noise and
loud
conversations
and quickly
throw up a
PowerPoint
presentation,
you might get
the funding
right there.
According to
Ask.com and
Wikipedia, one
in 125 Americans
was a
millionaire in
2004, or roughly
2.3 million
people. In a
later report, by
2008, roughly
1.0% of high-net
worth
individuals (HNWIs)
are those who
reside in
households with
a net worth or
wealth of $30
million or more.
There are
approximately
95,000 ultra-HNWIs
in the world
with 61,600 or
64.8% residing
in the United
States and
Europe.The
report is
compiled
annually by
Capgemini for
Merrill Lynch.
Today, we’ll
categorize all
these as
potential
angels, discuss
their
characteristics,
and, give some
tips as to
finding and
capturing them.
Today’s
Angels
Today, angel
groups play a
major role in
financing
smaller
ventures. Many
VC companies
have moved
upstream and
only finance
deals over $5
million. Angels
have filled the
gap the VC’s
created by their
upstream move,
and many
concentrate on
start-ups and
smaller,
emerging
companies. A
detailed look
provides some
surprising and
somewhat
reassuring
statistics.
In 2004, angel
investing first
totaled $30
billion in
comparison to
$30 billion to
$35 billion in
venture capital
investments,
depending on how
you count them.
Those angel
investments also
went into an
order of
magnitude to a
greater number
of companies:
50,000 versus
fewer than 3,000
VC-backed
companies.
One investor
analyst argued
that "angel core
values are back
in vogue" as
people with
industry
experience take
leadership roles
in backing new
entrepreneurial
ventures. He
also noted that
the "capital
gap" between
high-end angel
rounds and
low-end venture
capital has
grown to between
$2 million and
$5 million in
financing as
venture capital
firms continue
to increase
median deal size
and angel
investors hit an
upper limit of
what is
practical in a
single round of
financing.
Another analyst
argued that the
50,000
angel-backed
firms fall in
the same
categories as VC
investments,
i.e., software,
hardware,
biotech. These
are not
restaurants and
dry cleaners.
Also, he
underscored that
the $30 billion
figure is sound.
But with these
statistics,
questions remain
for more
research, such
as: what happens
to the
angel-backed
ventures that
don't receive VC
funding? Many
grow and
succeed; others
fail.
“In 2004, only
3,000 new firms
were founded by
VC’s, while an
estimated 48,000
businesses
received
start-up capital
from people that
identified
themselves as
angels.”
This can get a
bit confusing
since many, many
different kinds
of organizations
can qualify to
be called
angels. For
example: “Clubs,
Groups &
Associations.”
Almost every
area of the US
has associations
meant to attract
or help
entrepreneurs.
In California’s
San Francisco
Bay Area, there
are a number of
such
organizations.
These would
include general
organizations
such as The
Churchill Club
in Campbell and
the Software
Forum in Palo
Alto. There are
also “national”
groups such as
the Asian
Business
Association in
San Francisco
and Monte Jade
in Santa Clara
that promote the
business
interests of
Asians, both
those living in
the US and Asia.
No matter where
you live in the
US, you’ll find
groups whose
charter is to
nurture
entrepreneurs.
When in doubt
for where to
look, start at
the business
schools of your
local
universities or
your local
Chamber of
Commerce. There
are the pure
angel
associations,
such as Rocky
Mountain Angels
and New York
Angels.
Investment
Clubs & Rank
Amateurs
There are
small,
investment clubs
that pool
together a few
thousand dollars
from their
individual
members. These
clubs usually
invest in the
stock market. A
few dabble in
start-ups and
other risky
ventures. From
your view as an
entrepreneur,
they are
amateurs playing
with “anxious
money.” They
rarely make any
significant
investments, but
drive you (or
your CEO) crazy
with constant
naive questions
and near-daily
suggestions.
There are other
amateurs: “Green
Angels,” the
noveau-riche
that just made a
killing on some
deal or stock
option and are
investing for
the first time.
Having them in
your company is
similar in
pleasure to a
root canal.
A Real
World Example:
Once I was
trying to raise
second-round
money for a
venture. One of
our directors
said he had an
investment group
(5 people) of
MIT faculty that
was interested.
He booked a
private room in
Locke-Ober’s for
dinner. (This is
still one of the
most expensive
restaurants in
Boston and home
to many of “Old-
Boston’s Power
Elite.” At the
time, they still
didn’t allow
women in certain
sections.)
When they
arrived (late),
the oldest
looked to be
17-18. I found
out they were
all students at
MIT, not
teachers. They
proceeded to
order the most
expensive
appetizers,
lobster entrees,
wines and fancy
liquors on the
menu.
However, they
had done their
homework on our
venture. I sat
for hours while
they asked an
endless array of
questions,
ranging from the
very basics to
minor details.
At a break, and
going against
the prior advice
of my friend
(not a very good
salesperson), I
finally asked
them how big
their fund was
and how much
they might
invest in our
venture.
They said they
had a total pool
of $10,000 and
might go as high
as $2,500 for us
if they liked
all my answers
to their
questions.
I don’t think it
occurred to them
that the cost of
the night’s
dinner would eat
up a substantial
part of their
entire
contribution.
As we were
leaving, one had
the balls to ask
me: “What do the
other members of
your team do
while you’re out
having fun like
this?” I was
very proud of
myself that I
didn’t hit him.
I made my friend
pay for the
dinner.
Still, you may
find some
potential in
certain
investment
clubs. People
that have common
social
associations
such as friends,
neighbors,
colleagues or
other persons
who pool money
for the purpose
of making
investments most
often form
these. If your
business offers
a potentially
high ROI, and
you are willing
to trade off
some of your
ownership future
for current
cash, you might
consider these.
Beware of the
fact that each
of the
individuals in
these clubs will
consider
themselves to be
your most
important
stockholder for
very a long
time.
Internet
Investors and
Networks
Against
any/all current
wisdom, I have
never had any
luck finding
investors
through “Listing
Exchanges” over
the Internet. I
have met some
interesting
people and
followed
numerous
opportunities,
but have never
been able to get
a check from
anybody.
I think there’s
a basic
underlying
fallacy with the
Internet or
other such
“matching”
services. They
all list
entrepreneurs
(mostly for a
fee) and hope
that investors
will look at the
listings contact
the
entrepreneurs
and make a deal.
Many of the
services also
ask investors
for some
personal
information
similar to that
required in a
“Sophisticated
Investor”
letter. Thus,
the potential
investor gives
away some of
their privacy
before they even
begin.
I would bet that
the people
looking for
funding via the
Internet
matching
outnumbers
potential
investors by at
least 500 to 1.
I have a tough
time imagining
an investor with
loose-change
spending hours
searching for
companies on the
Internet. It’s a
lot of work and
it’s much easier
for this person
to invest in a
stock, bond or
VC fund. Also, I
have found that
many of the
companies on the
Internet that
respond to
investor
inquiries are
naive and
incredibly
ill-prepared.
To make matters
worst, many of
the “matching”
home pages now
beginning to
charge both the
companies
seeking funds
and the
potential
investors
through a
“membership
dues” ploy. As a
potential
investor, I may
now be further
inconvenienced
by having to
spend my money
just to look for
investments.
Further, I may
have to wade
through many
“screening
menus” to get to
certain
potential
investment
categories.
On the other
hand, a few
years ago, I had
a business
meeting with the
principals of a
venture in
Fremont, CA.
Their president
swore he got
$50,000 from an
investor in
Thailand after
two e-mail
exchanges. I
didn’t see the
check, but I
have no reason
not to believe
him.
College
Venture Networks
Stanford, MIT,
UCLA, UNH and
other
universities
have matching
services that
pre-date the
Internet. I have
tried them. My
experience is
similar to such
services on the
Internet.
Partnerships
and Dependent
Joint Ventures
Instead of
looking for pure
investment
funds, you might
consider forming
partnerships or
joint ventures
with
complementary
companies.
Generally, in
these structures
each partner
puts up capital
(or other
assets) to form
the company.
Each partner
agrees to hold a
certain
percentage of
ownership in the
company and is
to be paid part
of the profits,
depending on the
degree of
ownership held.
Often, this
structure
initially seems
attractive since
the individuals
bring
complementary
assets. For
instance, a beef
supplier or bun
baker partners
and invests in a
hamburger shop.
The degree of
ownership will
usually depend
on the money
invested or
individual
experience,
skills and/or
effort. The
original
entrepreneur may
own a larger
piece than the
pure amount of
money invested.
Or, sometimes
they invest no
money and become
an equal partner
for their
concepts and
expertise.
On the dark
side, every
dollar of profit
has to be split
between you and
your partners.
Further,
partnerships
have the very
highest failure
rates, since all
the partners may
not have the
same goals. The
result is often
that the people
don’t get along
well and since
they are
partners, all
share in the
decision-making.
Bad personal
relations may
end up souring
the entire
partnership with
no easy remedy.
Be aware that
actually
choosing a
partnership as
the legal form,
you may never be
able to get new,
outside
investors. For
instance, many
partnership
agreements
automatically
terminate upon
the death or
loss of a single
partner and no
outside moneyman
will accept such
arrangements.
“Entrepreneur
Showcases”
The schools
and
organizations
above also
sponsor periodic
“showcases” of
new ventures and
businesses. They
are well
attended by
potential
investors and
the climate is
very conducive
to deal making.
I would urge you
to be an
exhibitor at any
of these you can
find. Societies
such as MIT,
Asian Business
Association and
Monte Jade also
host such
meetings. The
latter are
fascinating
since many VC’s
from Taipei,
Hong Kong and
Singapore
attended,
actively looking
for US
investments.
Where else can
you make your
pitch to a
qualified
audience (they
have the money)
that have also
traveled some
distance and
paid to listen
to you?
Family
Investment
Companies
A number of
wealthy families
in the United
States and
Canada have set
up foundations
and corporations
for investment
purposes.
Typically,
family members
pool their
resources into a
company and have
it managed by
investment
professionals.
More and more
family fortunes
are being made
available as
seed capital for
new and emerging
enterprises.
Venture
Capital
Executives as
Angels
Many of the
senior managers
of VC companies
that I’ve known
will take
personal flyers
on deals that
they absolutely
refuse to
consider for
their funds.
Basically they
like the people
or the idea and
may throw their
own money into
the deal.
Every time any
VC ever turns
you down, always
ask him/her if
they’d be
interested
personally
and/or if there
are any other
VC’s that they
know that might
also be
potential
angels.
Other
Alternatives and
Variations
Thus far, we’ve
discussed
various sources
of equity deals.
A few
variations:
Angel &
Venture Capital
Loans
In some cases,
investors may
loan
entrepreneurs
the necessary
capital. These
are sometimes
only guaranteed
by stock in the
company as
collateral.
These deals
sometimes work
out very well
for the VC’s.
In June of 1997,
Benchmark
Capital of Menlo
Park, CA made
two loans of
$750,000 to a
small, online
auction company,
eBay, Inc. The
founder and
another employee
pledged 6.9
million shares
each as
collateral. In
January of 1999,
Benchmark called
a clause in the
agreement,
gaining 13.8
million shares
of stock. In
April of 1999,
the stock was
worth
$171.75/share or
some $2.4
billion, a
160,000% return!
Venture
Capital/Angel
Guarantors
(Loan/Line
Guarantees)